← Back to directory

Jonathan J Deeks

Researcher Next ID · RN-021899

Researcher · Decision Sciences

Birmingham City University

Birmingham, United Kingdom

Not currently recruitingFunding unknown
Works count
657
Citation count
176,980
H-index
133
i10-index
365

Research interests

Decision Sciences
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Medicine
Mathematics
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing

Publications

  • Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS‐CoV‐2

    LSTM Online Archive (Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine) · 2022

  • Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension

    Nature Medicine · 2020 · https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-1034-x

  • Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist

    BMJ · 2020 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2632

  • Rapid, point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection

    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2020 · 10.1002/14651858.cd013705

  • FibroScan-AST (FAST) score for the non-invasive identification of patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis with significant activity and fibrosis: a prospective derivation and global validation study

    ˜The œLancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2020 · 10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30383-8

  • Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses

    Journal · 2019 · 10.1002/9781119536604.ch10

  • Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect

    Journal · 2019 · https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119536604.ch6

  • Accuracy of FibroScan Controlled Attenuation Parameter and Liver Stiffness Measurement in Assessing Steatosis and Fibrosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

    Gastroenterology · 2019 · 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.042

  • Interpreting results and drawing conclusions

    Journal · 2019 · https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119536604.ch15

  • Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies

    JAMA · 2018 · https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.19163

  • MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis

    New England Journal of Medicine · 2018 · https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1801993

  • ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions

    BMJ · 2016 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919

  • Cellular immune correlates of protection against symptomatic pandemic influenza

    Nature Medicine · 2013 · 10.1038/nm.3350

  • Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials

    Annals of Internal Medicine · 2012 · 10.7326/0003-4819-157-6-201209180-00537

  • Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses

    BMJ · 2011 · 10.1136/bmj.d549

  • Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials

    BMJ · 2011 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4002

  • Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses

    Journal · 2008

  • Metan: Fixed- and Random-Effects Meta-Analysis

    The Stata Journal Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · 2008 · 10.1177/1536867x0800800102

  • Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta‐Analyses

    Journal · 2008 · 10.1002/9780470712184.ch9

  • Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy

    Annals of Internal Medicine · 2008 · 10.7326/0003-4819-149-12-200812160-00008

  • Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta‐analytical methods with rare events

    Statistics in Medicine · 2006 · 10.1002/sim.2528

  • The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed

    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2005 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.016

  • Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios

    BMJ · 2004 · 10.1136/bmj.329.7458.168

  • Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

    BMJ · 2003 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557

  • Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies

    Health Technology Assessment · 2003 · 10.3310/hta7270

  • Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests

    BMJ · 2001 · 10.1136/bmj.323.7305.157

  • Statistical Methods for Examining Heterogeneity and Combining Results from Several Studies in Meta‐Analysis

    Journal · 2001 · 10.1002/9780470693926.ch15

Current projects

    No projects listed.