James Thomas

Research interests

Publications

• A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas

  Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública · 2022 · https://doi.org/10.26633/rpsp.2022.112

• The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

  International Journal of Surgery · 2021 · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906

• PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews

  BMJ · 2021 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160

• Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas

  Revista Española de Cardiología · 2021 · 10.1016/j.recesp.2021.06.016

• Pravila PRISMA 2020.

  Medicina Fluminensis · 2021 · https://doi.org/10.21860/medflum2021_264903

• The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

  Systematic Reviews · 2021 · https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4

• Susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Children and Adolescents Compared With Adults

  Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine · 2020 · https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.4573

• Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline

  BMJ · 2020 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6890

• Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

  Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2019 · 10.1002/14651858.ed000142

• Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

  Journal · 2019 · https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119536604

• Making progress with the automation of systematic reviews: principles of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR)

  Systematic Reviews · 2018 · https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0740-7

• Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2017 · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.010

• The need for a complex systems model of evidence for public health

  The Lancet · 2017 · 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31267-9

• Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2017 · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.010

• Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2017 · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.011

• Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2017 · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.011

• Living systematic reviews: 4. Living guideline recommendations

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2017 · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.009

• Impact and experiences of delayed discharge: A mixed‐studies systematic review

  Health Expectations · 2017 · https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12619

• Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches

  Systematic Reviews · 2015 · https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-5

• A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers

  BMC Health Services Research · 2014 · 10.1186/1472-6963-14-2

• Clarifying differences between review designs and methods

  Systematic Reviews · 2012 · https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-28

• Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review

  BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2009 · 10.1186/1471-2288-9-59

• Colon Cancer

  Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · 2009 · https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2009.0056

• Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews

  BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2008 · 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45

Current projects

No projects listed.