Gunn Elisabeth Vist

Research interests

Publications

• The mental health impact of the covid-19 pandemic on healthcare workers, and interventions to help them: A rapid systematic review

  Psychiatry Research · 2020 · 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113441

• Interpreting results and drawing conclusions

  · 2019 · 10.1002/9781119536604.ch15

• Completing ‘Summary of findings’ tables and grading the certainty of the evidence

  · 2019 · 10.1002/9781119536604.ch14

• GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2013 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.03.013

• GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing Summary of Findings tables and evidence profiles—continuous outcomes

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2012 · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.08.001

• GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2012 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.006

• GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing Summary of Findings tables—binary outcomes

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2012 · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.012

• GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026

• GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.011

• GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.017

• GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.012

• GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.04.014

• GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.017

• GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.06.004

• Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials

  Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2011 · 10.1002/14651858.mr000012.pub3

• GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015

• GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2010 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.012

• What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians?

  BMJ · 2008 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39490.551019.be

• GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

  BMJ · 2008 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad

• Going from evidence to recommendations

  BMJ · 2008 · 10.1136/bmj.39493.646875.ae

• Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies

  BMJ · 2008 · 10.1136/bmj.39500.677199.ae

• Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations

  BMJ · 2008 · 10.1136/bmj.39504.506319.80

• Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

  BMJ · 2004 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490

• Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: Critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group

  BMC Health Services Research · 2004 · 10.1186/1472-6963-4-38

• Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review

  Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · 2002 · 10.1258/135581902320432778

Current projects

No projects listed.