Andrew D Oxman

Research interests

Publications

• GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines

  BMJ · 2016 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i2089

• GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction

  BMJ · 2016 · 10.1136/bmj.i2016

• GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2013 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.03.013

• A checklist for identifying determinants of practice: A systematic review and synthesis of frameworks and taxonomies of factors that prevent or enable improvements in healthcare professional practice

  Implementation Science · 2013 · https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-35

• GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation—determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2013 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.003

• GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing Summary of Findings tables and evidence profiles—continuous outcomes

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2012 · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.08.001

• Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes

  Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2012 · https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd000259.pub3

• GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing Summary of Findings tables—binary outcomes

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2012 · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.012

• GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.017

• GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015

• The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

  BMJ · 2011 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928

• GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026

• GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.06.004

• GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.017

• GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.012

• GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.04.014

• GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.011

• GRADE guidelines: A new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2010 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.011

• GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2010 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.012

• A pragmatic–explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2009 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.12.011

• Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes

  Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2009 · 10.1002/14651858.cd003030.pub2

• What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians?

  BMJ · 2008 · 10.1136/bmj.39490.551019.be

• GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

  BMJ · 2008 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad

• Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies

  BMJ · 2008 · 10.1136/bmj.39500.677199.ae

• Going from evidence to recommendations

  BMJ · 2008 · 10.1136/bmj.39493.646875.ae

• Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement

  BMJ · 2008 · 10.1136/bmj.a2390

• Educational outreach visits: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes

  Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2007 · 10.1002/14651858.cd000409.pub2

• Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: Critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group

  BMC Health Services Research · 2004 · 10.1186/1472-6963-4-38

• Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

  BMJ · 2004 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490

Current projects

No projects listed.