Holger J. Schünemann
Researcher Next ID · RN-023667
Researcher · Medicine
Rozzano, Germany
- Works count
- 1,167
- Citation count
- 213,121
- H-index
- 176
- i10-index
- 807
Research interests
Publications
A tool to assess risk of bias in non-randomized follow-up studies of exposure effects (ROBINS-E)
Environment International · 2024 · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2024.108602
Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
The Lancet · 2020 · https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31142-9
American Society of Hematology 2020 Guidelines for Management of Venous Thromboembolism: Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism
Blood Advances · 2020 · https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001830
GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2019 · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.014
American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prophylaxis for hospitalized and nonhospitalized medical patients
Blood Advances · 2018 · https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2018022954
Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines—2016 revision
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2017 · 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.03.050
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
BMJ · 2016 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919
GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines
BMJ · 2016 · 10.1136/bmj.i2089
GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction
BMJ · 2016 · 10.1136/bmj.i2016
Use of GRADE for assessment of evidence about prognosis: rating confidence in estimates of event rates in broad categories of patients
BMJ · 2015 · 10.1136/bmj.h870
An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline: Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: An Update of the 2011 Clinical Practice Guideline
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2015 · 10.1164/rccm.201506-1063st
Intake of saturated and trans unsaturated fatty acids and risk of all cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
BMJ · 2015 · 10.1136/bmj.h3978
Myocardial Injury after Noncardiac Surgery
Anesthesiology · 2014 · 10.1097/aln.0000000000000113
A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis
BMJ · 2014 · 10.1136/bmj.g5630
GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2013 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.03.013
GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation—determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2013 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.003
GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2012 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.006
GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing Summary of Findings tables and evidence profiles—continuous outcomes
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2012 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.08.001
GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing Summary of Findings tables—binary outcomes
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2012 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.012
GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015
GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.04.014
GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.011
GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.06.004
Chapter 12: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions
Journal · 2011
An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Statement: Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Evidence-based Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2011 · https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.2009-040gl
GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.017
GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.012
Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines: 2010 Revision
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2010 · 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.06.047
GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2010 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.012
GRADE guidelines: A new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2010 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.011
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
BMJ · 2008 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad
What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians?
BMJ · 2008 · 10.1136/bmj.39490.551019.be
Going from evidence to recommendations
BMJ · 2008 · 10.1136/bmj.39493.646875.ae
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies
BMJ · 2008 · 10.1136/bmj.39500.677199.ae
Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: Critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group
BMC Health Services Research · 2004 · 10.1186/1472-6963-4-38
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
BMJ · 2004 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490
Current projects
No projects listed.