← Back to directory

Holger J. Schünemann

Researcher Next ID · RN-023667

Researcher · Medicine

Humanitas University

Rozzano, Germany

Not currently recruitingFunding unknown
Works count
1,167
Citation count
213,121
H-index
176
i10-index
807

Research interests

Medicine
Decision Sciences
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Health Professions
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Health Policy Implementation Science
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

Publications

  • A tool to assess risk of bias in non-randomized follow-up studies of exposure effects (ROBINS-E)

    Environment International · 2024 · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2024.108602

  • Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    The Lancet · 2020 · https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31142-9

  • American Society of Hematology 2020 Guidelines for Management of Venous Thromboembolism: Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism

    Blood Advances · 2020 · https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001830

  • GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions

    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2019 · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.014

  • American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prophylaxis for hospitalized and nonhospitalized medical patients

    Blood Advances · 2018 · https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2018022954

  • Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines—2016 revision

    Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2017 · 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.03.050

  • ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions

    BMJ · 2016 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919

  • GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines

    BMJ · 2016 · 10.1136/bmj.i2089

  • GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction

    BMJ · 2016 · 10.1136/bmj.i2016

  • Use of GRADE for assessment of evidence about prognosis: rating confidence in estimates of event rates in broad categories of patients

    BMJ · 2015 · 10.1136/bmj.h870

  • An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline: Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: An Update of the 2011 Clinical Practice Guideline

    American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2015 · 10.1164/rccm.201506-1063st

  • Intake of saturated and trans unsaturated fatty acids and risk of all cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

    BMJ · 2015 · 10.1136/bmj.h3978

  • Myocardial Injury after Noncardiac Surgery

    Anesthesiology · 2014 · 10.1097/aln.0000000000000113

  • A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis

    BMJ · 2014 · 10.1136/bmj.g5630

  • GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations

    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2013 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.03.013

  • GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation—determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength

    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2013 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.003

  • GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes

    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2012 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.006

  • GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing Summary of Findings tables and evidence profiles—continuous outcomes

    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2012 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.08.001

  • GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing Summary of Findings tables—binary outcomes

    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2012 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.012

  • GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence

    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015

  • GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness

    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.04.014

  • GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias

    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.011

  • GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence

    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.06.004

  • Chapter 12: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions

    Journal · 2011

  • An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Statement: Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Evidence-based Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management

    American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2011 · https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.2009-040gl

  • GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency

    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.017

  • GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision

    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.012

  • Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines: 2010 Revision

    Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2010 · 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.06.047

  • GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes

    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2010 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.012

  • GRADE guidelines: A new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2010 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.011

  • GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

    BMJ · 2008 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad

  • What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians?

    BMJ · 2008 · 10.1136/bmj.39490.551019.be

  • Going from evidence to recommendations

    BMJ · 2008 · 10.1136/bmj.39493.646875.ae

  • Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies

    BMJ · 2008 · 10.1136/bmj.39500.677199.ae

  • Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: Critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group

    BMC Health Services Research · 2004 · 10.1186/1472-6963-4-38

  • Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

    BMJ · 2004 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490

Current projects

    No projects listed.