← Back to directory

John P. A. Ioannidis

Researcher Next ID · RN-026999

Researcher · Decision Sciences

La Trobe University

Melbourne, United States

Not currently recruitingFunding unknown
Works count
1,852
Citation count
316,031
H-index
230
i10-index
1,180

Research interests

Decision Sciences
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Mathematics
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
scientometrics and bibliometrics research

Publications

  • CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials

    BMJ · 2025 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-081123

  • Artificial intelligence versus clinicians: systematic review of design, reporting standards, and claims of deep learning studies

    BMJ · 2020 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m689

  • Development of the Instrument to assess the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses (ICEMAN) in randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses

    Canadian Medical Association Journal · 2020 · https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.200077

  • Comparative Efficacy and Acceptability of 21 Antidepressant Drugs for the Acute Treatment of Adults With Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

    The Lancet · 2018 · https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32802-7

  • A manifesto for reproducible science

    Nature Human Behaviour · 2017 · https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021

  • Redefine statistical significance

    Nature Human Behaviour · 2017 · 10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z

  • Plea for routinely presenting prediction intervals in meta-analysis

    BMJ Open · 2016 · 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010247

  • Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration

    Annals of Internal Medicine · 2015 · 10.7326/m14-0698

  • The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations

    Annals of Internal Medicine · 2015 · 10.7326/m14-2385

  • The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method

    BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2014 · 10.1186/1471-2288-14-25

  • Large-scale meta-analysis of genome-wide association data identifies six new risk loci for Parkinson's disease

    Nature Genetics · 2014 · 10.1038/ng.3043

  • Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience

    Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2013 · 10.1038/nrn3475

  • Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials

    Annals of Internal Medicine · 2012 · 10.7326/0003-4819-157-6-201209180-00537

  • Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials

    BMJ · 2011 · 10.1136/bmj.d4002

  • Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial

    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2010 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.016

  • EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus with neuropsychiatric manifestations: report of a task force of the EULAR standing committee for clinical affairs

    Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · 2010 · 10.1136/ard.2010.130476

  • EULAR recommendations for vaccination in adult patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases

    Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · 2010 · 10.1136/ard.2010.137216

  • The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration

    Annals of Internal Medicine · 2009 · https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136

  • The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration

    BMJ · 2009 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700

  • The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration

    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2009 · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006

  • STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA)— An Extension of the STROBE Statement

    PLoS Medicine · 2009 · 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000022

  • The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration

    PLoS Medicine · 2009 · https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100

  • Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias

    PLoS ONE · 2008 · 10.1371/journal.pone.0003081

  • Genome-wide association studies for complex traits: consensus, uncertainty and challenges

    Nature Reviews Genetics · 2008 · 10.1038/nrg2344

  • EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus. Report of a Task Force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics

    Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · 2007 · 10.1136/ard.2007.070367

  • Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

    PLoS Medicine · 2005 · https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

  • Replication validity of genetic association studies

    Nature Genetics · 2001 · 10.1038/ng749

Current projects

    No projects listed.