Penny Whiting

Research interests

Publications

• Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement

  BMJ · 2022 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-070849

• A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas

  Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública · 2022 · https://doi.org/10.26633/rpsp.2022.112

• The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

  International Journal of Surgery · 2021 · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906

• Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas

  Revista Española de Cardiología · 2021 · 10.1016/j.recesp.2021.06.016

• PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews

  BMJ · 2021 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160

• Pravila PRISMA 2020.

  Medicina Fluminensis · 2021 · https://doi.org/10.21860/medflum2021_264903

• Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist

  BMJ · 2020 · 10.1136/bmj.m2632

• The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

  Journal · 2020 · https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/v7gm2

• RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

  BMJ · 2019 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898

• PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration

  Annals of Internal Medicine · 2018 · 10.7326/m18-1377

• Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies

  JAMA · 2018 · 10.1001/jama.2017.19163

• PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies

  Annals of Internal Medicine · 2018 · 10.7326/m18-1376

• ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions

  BMJ · 2016 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919

• ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2015 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005

• Cannabinoids for Medical Use

  JAMA · 2015 · 10.1001/jama.2015.6358

• QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies

  Annals of Internal Medicine · 2011 · https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009

• Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies

  BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2006 · 10.1186/1471-2288-6-9

• A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies

  Biostatistics · 2006 · 10.1093/biostatistics/kxl004

• No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies

  BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2005 · https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-5-19

• Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy

  Annals of Internal Medicine · 2004 · 10.7326/0003-4819-140-3-200402030-00010

• Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies

  Health Technology Assessment · 2004 · https://doi.org/10.3310/hta8250

• The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews

  BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2003 · 10.1186/1471-2288-3-25

Current projects

No projects listed.