Johannes B. Reitsma

Research interests

Publications

• PROBAST+AI: an updated quality, risk of bias, and applicability assessment tool for prediction models using regression or artificial intelligence methods

  BMJ · 2025 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-082505

• TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods

  BMJ · 2024 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-078378

• Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence

  BMJ Open · 2021 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048008

• Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model

  BMJ · 2020 · 10.1136/bmj.m441

• Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist

  BMJ · 2020 · 10.1136/bmj.m2632

• Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal

  BMJ · 2020 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1328

• Sample size for binary logistic prediction models: Beyond events per variable criteria

  Statistical Methods in Medical Research · 2018 · 10.1177/0962280218784726

• Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies

  JAMA · 2018 · https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.19163

• PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies

  Annals of Internal Medicine · 2018 · 10.7326/m18-1376

• PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration

  Annals of Internal Medicine · 2018 · 10.7326/m18-1377

• A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prediction model performance

  BMJ · 2017 · 10.1136/bmj.i6460

• STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration

  BMJ Open · 2016 · 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012799

• Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement

  Annals of Internal Medicine · 2015 · 10.7326/m14-0697

• STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies

  Radiology · 2015 · 10.1148/radiol.2015151516

• STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies

  Clinical Chemistry · 2015 · 10.1373/clinchem.2015.246280

• Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement

  British Journal of Cancer · 2015 · 10.1038/bjc.2014.639

• STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies

  BMJ · 2015 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h5527

• Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement

  BMC Medicine · 2015 · 10.1186/s12916-014-0241-z

• Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement

  British journal of surgery · 2015 · 10.1002/bjs.9736

• Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD)

  Circulation · 2015 · 10.1161/circulationaha.114.014508

• Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement

  BMJ · 2015 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7594

• Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration

  Annals of Internal Medicine · 2015 · https://doi.org/10.7326/m14-0698

• Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist

  PLoS Medicine · 2014 · 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001744

• Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies

  BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2006 · 10.1186/1471-2288-6-9

• Polyp Miss Rate Determined by Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review

  The American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2006 · 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00390.x

• Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2005 · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.02.022

• Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy

  Annals of Internal Medicine · 2004 · 10.7326/0003-4819-140-3-200402030-00010

• Clinical Features and Prognostic Factors in Adults with Bacterial Meningitis

  New England Journal of Medicine · 2004 · 10.1056/nejmoa040845

• The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews

  BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2003 · https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-3-25

• Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy.

  PubMed · 2003 · 10.1373/49.1.1

Current projects

No projects listed.