Roman Jaeschke

Research interests

Publications

• GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2020 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.020

• Mortality and morbidity in acutely ill adults treated with liberal versus conservative oxygen therapy (IOTA): a systematic review and meta-analysis

  The Lancet · 2018 · https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30479-3

• Approaches to interpreting and choosing the best treatments in network meta-analyses

  Systematic Reviews · 2017 · 10.1186/s13643-017-0473-z

• Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

  Intensive Care Medicine · 2014 · https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z

• Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome: updated consensus definitions and clinical practice guidelines from the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome

  Intensive Care Medicine · 2013 · https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-013-2906-z

• Surviving Sepsis Campaign

  Critical Care Medicine · 2013 · https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e31827e83af

• GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation—determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2013 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.003

• Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock, 2012

  Intensive Care Medicine · 2013 · https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8

• Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pain, Agitation, and Delirium in Adult Patients in the Intensive Care Unit

  Critical Care Medicine · 2012 · 10.1097/ccm.0b013e3182783b72

• GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2012 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.006

• Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines Part 3 of 3. The GRADE approach to developing recommendations

  Allergy · 2011 · https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02530.x

• GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.017

• GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.012

• GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.04.014

• GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.06.004

• Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines

  Allergy · 2009 · 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.01973.x

• Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies

  BMJ · 2008 · 10.1136/bmj.39500.677199.ae

• Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008

  Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) · 2008 · 10.1097/01.ccm.0000298158.12101.41

• Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations

  BMJ · 2008 · 10.1136/bmj.39504.506319.80

• Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008

  Intensive Care Medicine · 2007 · https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0934-2

• An Official ATS Statement: Grading the Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations in ATS Guidelines and Recommendations

  American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2006 · 10.1164/rccm.200602-197st

• Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: Pilot study of a new system

  BMC Health Services Research · 2005 · 10.1186/1472-6963-5-25

• Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

  BMJ · 2004 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490

• Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group

  JAMA · 1992 · 10.1001/jama.268.17.2420

• Measurement of health status

  Controlled Clinical Trials · 1989 · https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6

Current projects

No projects listed.