Patrick M. Bossuyt

Research interests

Publications

• An unbiased ranking of murine dietary models based on their proximity to human metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)

  Nature Metabolism · 2024 · https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-024-01043-6

• Biomarkers for staging fibrosis and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (the LITMUS project): a comparative diagnostic accuracy study

  ˜The œLancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023 · https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-1253(23)00017-1

• Performance of non-invasive tests and histology for the prediction of clinical outcomes in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: an individual participant data meta-analysis

  ˜The œLancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023 · https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-1253(23)00141-3

• Performance of non-invasive tests and histology for the prediction of clinical outcomes in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: an individual participant data meta-analysis

  ˜The œLancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023 · https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-1253(23)00141-3

• A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas

  Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública · 2022 · https://doi.org/10.26633/rpsp.2022.112

• The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

  BMJ · 2021 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

• The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

  International Journal of Surgery · 2021 · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906

• PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews

  BMJ · 2021 · https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160

• Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas

  Revista Española de Cardiología · 2021 · 10.1016/j.recesp.2021.06.016

• Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2021 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.003

• Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for advanced fibrosis in patients with NAFLD: an individual patient data meta-analysis

  Gut · 2021 · https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324243

• Diagnostic accuracy of elastography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with NAFLD: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  Journal of Hepatology · 2021 · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2021.04.044

• Diagnostic accuracy of elastography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with NAFLD: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  Journal of Hepatology · 2021 · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2021.04.044

• Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist

  BMJ · 2020 · 10.1136/bmj.m2632

• False-negative results of initial RT-PCR assays for COVID-19: A systematic review

  PLoS ONE · 2020 · https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242958

• Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies

  JAMA · 2018 · https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.19163

• Comparison of risk prediction scores for venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a prospective cohort study

  Haematologica · 2017 · https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2017.169060

• STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration

  BMJ Open · 2016 · 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012799

• STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies

  Radiology · 2015 · 10.1148/radiol.2015151516

• STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies

  Clinical Chemistry · 2015 · 10.1373/clinchem.2015.246280

• STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies

  BMJ · 2015 · 10.1136/bmj.h5527

• Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research

  The Lancet · 2014 · 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62228-x

• Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies

  BMJ · 2008 · 10.1136/bmj.39500.677199.ae

• Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy

  Annals of Internal Medicine · 2008 · 10.7326/0003-4819-149-12-200812160-00008

• Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies

  Canadian Medical Association Journal · 2006 · 10.1503/cmaj.050090

• Polyp Miss Rate Determined by Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review

  The American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2006 · 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00390.x

• Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2005 · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.02.022

• Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy

  Annals of Internal Medicine · 2004 · 10.7326/0003-4819-140-3-200402030-00010

• The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews

  BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2003 · 10.1186/1471-2288-3-25

• Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy.

  PubMed · 2003 · 10.1373/49.1.1

• The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2003 · 10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00177-x

Current projects

No projects listed.